Chapter 1
Peace Studies and Early Buddhism: Concepts and Connections
1.1 Purpose of this Chapter
This chapter builds the basic ideas for this research. The thesis studies Buddha’s sacred relics from a peace studies perspective. To do that, we first need to understand what “peace” means in peace studies, and how early Buddhist texts speak about peace, safety, and harmony.
In this chapter I will:
-
Explain some simple ideas from peace studies.
-
Show how early Buddhist teachings talk about inner and outer peace.
-
Connect these ideas with the Buddha’s concern for the welfare and security of beings.
-
Show that Buddhist discipline (Vinaya) and practice are designed not only for personal liberation, but also for social harmony and protection of the community.
This conceptual base will later support the discussion on the custodians of Buddha’s sacred relics, and how relics can be part of Buddhist faith, cultural heritage, and social harmony.
1.2 Basic Concepts in Peace Studies
Peace studies is a modern field that looks at the causes of conflict and ways to build peace at different levels: within the person, between people, in communities, and between nations. In a simple way, peace studies often makes a distinction between:
-
Negative peace – the absence of direct violence, such as war or physical harm.
-
Positive peace – the presence of justice, cooperation, trust and social structures that support well-being.
Peace studies is also interested in:
-
Inner peace – the calm mind and emotional balance of a person.
-
Structural peace – fair systems, laws and institutions that reduce suffering and conflict.
When we read early Buddhist texts with these ideas in mind, we can see that they speak about peace on all these levels, even if they use different words. Concepts like khema (security/safety), santa (peaceful), and the “welfare and happiness of many beings” show a clear concern for both inner and outer peace.
1.3 Early Buddhist Understanding of Peace
In early Buddhism, peace is not only the absence of war. It is closely linked with the end of suffering (dukkha) and the removal of its causes. The Buddha describes suffering and its origin in the teaching of the Four Noble Truths:
-
There is suffering (stress, dissatisfaction).
-
Suffering has causes (craving and ignorance).
-
Suffering can end (cessation).
-
There is a path leading to that end.
In one passage, “birth, aging, death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, and despair” are all included under suffering. This shows that peace in Buddhism is very deep: it is not only social peace, but freedom from the mental and existential stress that marks the whole cycle of life and death.
Later Theravāda analysis explains that unwholesome states are rooted in greed, hatred, and delusion, while wholesome states are rooted in their absence. A modern handbook based on early teachings explains that all unskillful qualities “have a share in what’s unskillful” and are rooted in ignorance, while skillful qualities have their roots in non-greed, non-hatred, and non-delusion. From a peace studies perspective, we can say that the roots of violence and conflict are mental and ethical, and the Buddhist path tries to cut these roots.
The highest peace is Nibbāna, which is described with many names such as “unformed”, “truth”, “safe”, “sorrowless”, “deathless” and “island, refuge, cave, shelter”. These epithets show that Nibbāna is seen as a secure and unshakable state, beyond danger and fear.
1.4 The Buddha’s Thought of Security for Beings
The Itivuttaka records a short discourse where the Buddha says that two thoughts often occur to him:
-
The thought of security for beings
-
The thought of solitude
The text explains that the Buddha delights in non-ill will. Because he enjoys non-ill will, the thought comes to him:
“By this behaviour I do not oppress anyone either frail or firm.”
He also delights in solitude, and because of this he knows that what is unwholesome has been abandoned. The Buddha then tells the monks that they too should live delighting in non-ill will and solitude, so that the same thoughts arise in them.
From a peace studies perspective, this passage is very important. It shows that:
-
The Buddha consciously thinks about security for beings.
-
Peaceful behaviour is defined as not oppressing anyone, whether weak or strong.
-
Inner peace (solitude, absence of unwholesome states) and social peace (non-oppression) are linked.
This gives a strong scriptural basis for seeing the Buddha not only as a teacher of personal liberation, but also as a thinker deeply concerned with the safety and well-being of all beings.
1.5 Concord, Conflict, and the Welfare of Many
The early texts also show a clear concern with maintaining harmony in the community. In one passage, the Buddha lists seven methods for settling disputes in the Saṅgha:
-
A face-to-face verdict
-
A verdict of mindfulness
-
A verdict of past insanity
-
Acting according to what is admitted
-
Acting according to the majority
-
Further punishment where needed
-
“Covering over as with grass”
These methods are to be recited together “without dispute” so that the holy life will last long and “be for the benefit and happiness of many, out of sympathy for the world, for the welfare, benefit, and happiness of devas and human beings.”
Here we can see several important peace-related ideas:
-
Institutional tools for conflict resolution – formal ways to deal with disputes.
-
Concern for long-term stability – so that the holy life “will endure and last a long time”.
-
Universal compassion – “sympathy for the world… welfare and happiness of devas and human beings.”
Another passage shows the Buddha encouraging the monks to cultivate key qualities such as mindfulness, energy, and the factors of awakening, so that “this holy life may long endure and remain steadfast for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of the multitude, out of sympathy for the world.” Again, the emphasis is on both duration and public benefit.
From a peace studies viewpoint, we can say that the Buddha is trying to build institutional peace inside the Saṅgha. He gives procedures, virtues, and shared practices that reduce conflict and protect the community. This will later be a useful lens to analyse how the guardians of sacred relics should act to maintain harmony and trust.
1.6 The Ten Reasons for Rules: A Vinaya View of Social Peace
The Vinaya explains that rules of training are laid down by the Tathāgata “founded on ten reasons”:
-
For the excellence of the Order
-
For the comfort of the Order
-
For the restraint of evil-minded individuals
-
For the living in comfort of well-behaved monks
-
For the control of present cankers (defilements)
-
For the combating of future cankers
-
For the benefit of non-believers
-
For the increase in the number of believers
-
For the maintenance of the True Dhamma
-
For the furthering of Discipline
The text then shows how these reasons are connected, saying that what is for the excellence of the Order is also for its comfort, for the restraint of evil-minded persons, for the well-being of good monks, and so on, up to the maintenance of the true Dhamma and the furthering of discipline.
Seen from peace studies, these ten reasons create a very clear framework:
-
Internal peace – restraint of evil-minded individuals, control of cankers.
-
Communal peace – comfort and excellence of the Order, living in ease for well-behaved monks.
-
Public peace and trust – benefit of non-believers and increase of believers.
-
Historical peace – maintenance of the true Dhamma and discipline over time.
This is very relevant to our study of relic custodians. Guardians of sacred relics can understand their role in a similar way:
-
Protecting the moral image and excellence of the Buddhist community.
-
Creating safe and respectful spaces for practice.
-
Helping non-Buddhists and local communities to see the Dhamma as a source of benefit.
-
Keeping the heritage alive and pure for the future.
1.7 Nibbāna as the Ground of Peace
A practical handbook on dependent origination, based on classical sources, describes Nibbāna as “freedom-nature” and “peace-quality,” with terms like santa (peaceful), asoka (without sorrow), khema (safe/secure), and suddhi (purity). It also notes “protection images” such as “island (dīpa), refuge (tāṇa), cave (leṇa), shelter” that are used in the texts.
Nibbāna is not presented as a physical place, but as the cessation of craving, suffering, and their causes. The text warns against reifying “the Unconditioned” as a substance; it should be understood functionally as the end of affliction.
For peace studies, this is very important:
-
Ultimate peace in Buddhism is the end of inner conflict and ignorance.
-
This inner liberation supports non-violence and compassionate action in the world.
-
The images of “island”, “refuge”, and “shelter” can be used to think about Buddhist sacred spaces – including relic shrines – as symbolic reminders of this ultimate safety.
When communities gather around relics, they are not only honouring the physical remains of the Buddha. They are also honouring the peace and safety that Nibbāna represents. This connection between symbol and meaning will be explored later in the thesis.
1.8 Mental Roots of Violence and Peace
As mentioned above, the canonical analysis shows that unskillful actions arise from greed, hatred, and delusion, while skillful actions arise from non-greed, non-hatred, and non-delusion. A modern summary of these teachings explains that all unskillful qualities “side with what is unskillful” and are rooted in ignorance.
From a peace studies angle, we can see:
-
Violence and conflict are related to mental states of craving, aversion, and confusion.
-
Peaceful behaviour is linked to generosity, goodwill, and wisdom.
This mental framework will be useful later when we look at the behaviour of relic custodians. If the guardians act from greed (for money, power, fame), hatred (towards other groups), or delusion (misunderstanding the purpose of relics), their actions may create conflict and mistrust. If they act from non-greed, goodwill, and wisdom, their guardianship can support social harmony and inter-group respect.
1.9 Association, Community, and Moral Character
Another Itivuttaka passage states that beings of similar character associate with each other: “Beings of low disposition associate… with beings of low disposition. Beings of good disposition associate… with beings of good disposition.” The verses warn that bad companions pull one down, like a person on a plank sinking in the ocean.
This has a clear social message:
-
Communities are shaped by the moral quality of their associations.
-
If custodians and faithful followers gather around relics with wrong motives, the whole environment can become corrupt.
-
If they gather with pure intentions and good discipline, the place can become a centre of peace.
The text also warns against imposters in the yellow robe who behave badly and “are born in hell” because of their evil deeds. From a peace perspective, this shows how hypocrisy damages both personal future and social trust.
1.10 Peace, Discipline, and the Image of the Saṅgha
The Vinaya gives many examples where the Buddha corrects behaviour that harms the public image of the Saṅgha. For instance, when monks join sham battles and are injured, people mock them and say that such behaviour is “not profitable” even for lay people, who go to fights only for livelihood and family. The Buddha then lays down rules to prevent this.
Similarly, rules are made so that thieves wearing symbols of crime, or those in a king’s service, should not be allowed to go forth, because such cases disturb and frighten the public.
From a peace studies view, this shows that:
-
The Buddha is attentive to social perception and public safety.
-
Ethical discipline is not only a private matter; it protects trust between the Saṅgha and society.
-
A peaceful community must act in ways that do not cause fear, confusion, or scandal.
Later, when we look at the role of relic custodians, these examples will help us think about how their conduct affects public trust and inter-religious harmony.
1.11 Towards a Peace Studies Framework for Relic Custodianship
From the internal sources we have seen, we can already outline a simple framework that will guide the later chapters:
-
Inner Peace and Liberation
-
Based on the Four Noble Truths and the end of craving and ignorance.
-
Highest form is Nibbāna, described as safe, peaceful, sorrowless and deathless.
-
-
Compassionate Concern for the Security of Beings
-
The Buddha’s thought of “security for beings” and non-oppression.
-
-
Institutional and Communal Peace
-
Dispute-settling methods for the Saṅgha, designed “for the benefit and happiness of many”.
-
Ten reasons for rules, balancing inner discipline and public benefit.
-
-
Moral Roots of Peace and Violence
-
Greed, hatred and delusion as roots of unskillful action; their absence as roots of skillful action.
-
-
Association and Social Character
-
The quality of companions and leaders shapes the whole community.
-
In the later chapters, this framework can be applied in more detail to:
-
Historical and present-day practices around Buddha’s relics.
-
The role and responsibilities of custodians.
-
The use of relic shrines as spaces of dialogue, reconciliation, and cultural heritage protection.
1.12 Conclusion
This chapter has shown that early Buddhist texts and later Theravāda analysis contain rich material for a peace studies perspective. The Buddha’s thought of security for beings, his concern for the welfare of many, the Vinaya’s ten reasons for rules, and the emphasis on inner transformation all point to a vision where personal liberation and social harmony support each other.


.jpeg)



