Isn't there wrong attention (micchā manasikāra) regarding persons and beings upon the aggregates? Think about it.
In seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, and knowing, #the_aggregates_are_present.
If you understand these aggregates clearly and precisely, the wrong views of clinging to humans, devas, and brahmas will fall away. #Understanding_aggregates_is_necessary.
What is seen is covered by perception (saññā). When doubt about perception is cleared, uncertainty disappears. What is seen is just visible form (rūpa-dhātu), but perception mistakes it for princes and princesses. Isn't this mistaking marks on medicine bottles?
Wrong perception is saññā-vipallāsa
Wrong knowing is citta-vipallāsa
Wrong view is diṭṭhi-vipallāsa
Personality-belief (sakkāya-diṭṭhi) arises due to wrong perception, wrong knowing, and wrong view. Therefore, what is seen is covered by perception, and doubt will only clear when perception is investigated.
When looking through the lens of wisdom at visible form:
Are you seeing a person or just visible form?
Are you seeing a deva or just visible form?
Are you seeing a brahma or just visible form?
#You_see_only_form - isn't this worth investigating?
When you truly see only visible form:
Do you still find a person?
Do you still find a deva?
Do you still find a brahma?
Do you still find princes and princesses?
Why don't you find them? Because they don't exist.
For one who truly sees and knows they don't exist,
Can they still cling? How can they cling when #there_is_nothing_to_cling_to?
Isn't this worth examining? Let's study this...