THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION MUSEUM
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
Template No.: T212
Template Title: Visitor FAQ Sheet on Science & Relics (Planning)
Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster E (Science, Testing, Misinformation), Cases 46–65
Linked Templates / Policies: T190 (Media Content Approval), T211 (Science–Faith Dialogue Plan), Relic Respect & Safeguarding Rules, Scientific Verification SOP, T183 (Feedback/Complaint), T173 (Records Classification)
Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______
Prepared by / Role: _______________________
Office / Unit: ____________________________
Country / Location: _______________________
Confidentiality Level:
Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive
Use of this form (tick):
New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]
1) Purpose (why we use this sheet)
This sheet plans a Visitor FAQ about science and relics.
It helps us give short, truthful answers and reduce rumours.
2) FAQ identity and audience
FAQ title (public-facing): _________________________________________
Format (tick): Wall panel [ ] Leaflet [ ] Website page [ ] Social post [ ] Tour guide notes [ ] Other: ____
Main audience (tick): General visitors [ ] Pilgrims [ ] Students [ ] Donors [ ] Media (approved) [ ] Other: ____
Reading level target: Simple (B1) [ ] Very simple (A2) [ ]
Languages needed: _______________________________________________
3) Scope and boundaries (important)
Tick to confirm:
We do not share Sacred-Restricted security or access details. Yes [ ]
We do not give “how-to” instructions for testing or copying relics. Yes [ ]
We explain science in simple and safe words. Yes [ ]
We say clearly when something is unknown. Yes [ ]
Sensitive topics to avoid (list):
4) Key principles for answers (style rules)
Tick to confirm:
Use calm and respectful words. [ ]
Do not exaggerate or promise “final proof.” [ ]
Explain limits of science and limits of stories. [ ]
Respect faith and also respect evidence. [ ]
If visitors disagree, invite peaceful dialogue. [ ]
5) Top 10 questions and draft short answers (planning table)
Fill the 10 questions visitors ask most. Keep answers 3–6 lines.
For each Q/A, also fill: sensitivity, doctrinal check, and lab review.
Q1
Question (visitor words): ________________________________________
Draft short answer (simple):
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Sensitivity level: Low [ ] Medium [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check needed? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Lab review needed? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes / sources to check: ___________________________________________
Q2
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q3
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q4
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q5
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q6
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q7
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q8
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q9
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
Q10
Question: __________________________________________________________
Answer: ___________________________________________________________
Science accuracy needed? Yes [ ] No [ ] Sensitivity: Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ]
Doctrinal check? Yes [ ] No [ ] Lab review? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Notes/sources: _____________________________________________________
6) Doctrinal check (monastic/ethics review)
Reviewer (name/role): ______________________________________________
Date reviewed: ____ / ____ / ______
Tick to confirm:
The wording is respectful to Buddha, Dhamma, Sangha. Yes [ ]
The wording supports peace and does not attack any group. Yes [ ]
The wording supports truthful speech and careful claims. Yes [ ]
The wording avoids superstition-selling and fear messages. Yes [ ]
Doctrinal notes / required edits:
Approved for doctrinal tone: Yes [ ] No [ ] Pending [ ]
7) Review by labs / scientists (accuracy review)
Lab / institution name: _____________________________________________
Reviewer name/title: ________________________________________________
Date reviewed: ____ / ____ / ______
Tick to confirm:
Science words are correct and not misleading. Yes [ ]
Limits/uncertainty are clearly stated. Yes [ ]
No risky “how-to testing” content is included. Yes [ ]
No claims are made without evidence. Yes [ ]
Lab notes / required edits:
Approved for science accuracy: Yes [ ] No [ ] Pending [ ]
8) Final approvals (public release control)
Planned classification for the final FAQ (T173): Public [ ] Internal [ ] Restricted [ ]
Approval for public use (tick):
Visitor Services lead [ ] Communications lead [ ] Director/Authority [ ]
Approved by (name/role): __________________________ Signature: _________ Date: //____
Second approver (if required): _____________________ Signature: _________ Date: //____
9) Publishing and update plan
Where it will be used (tick): Front desk [ ] Gallery wall [ ] Website [ ] Social media [ ] Tour guide pack [ ]
Version number: v_____
Review cycle (tick): Every 6 months [ ] Yearly [ ] After any incident/rumour [ ] Other: ____
Next review date: ____ / ____ / ______
10) Filing
File code / reference ID: ____________________
File location (cabinet/folder + digital path): __________________________
