Dhamma · Reflection · Statements · Peaceful Communication
Archive and publication page · Use Search, Topics, or the Month & Year archive to locate related materials.

Office Of Siridantamahapalaka: Template No.: T232 Template Title: Risk & Impact Assessment Sheet (Conflict + Security)

Chronological Archive

Template No.: T232 Template Title: Risk & Impact Assessment Sheet (Conflict + Security)

 THE HSWAGATA BUDDHA TOOTH RELIC PRESERVATION MUSEUM

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Template No.: T232

Template Title: Risk & Impact Assessment Sheet (Conflict + Security)

Related Research Case IDs / Cluster: Cluster F – HGT Conflicts & Security (Cases 66–85)

Linked Templates / Policies: T226 (Overview), T227 (Chronology), T229 (Evidence Index), T231 (Actions Tracker), T236 (Security Incident), T237 (Emergency Relic Protection), T246 (Confidentiality Decision)

Date of form: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: _______________________

Office / Unit: ____________________________

Country / Location: _______________________

Confidentiality Level:

Internal only [ ] Restricted [ ] Sacred-Restricted / Sensitive [ ]

Use of this form (tick):

New case / action [ ] Follow-up [ ] Annual review [ ] Archive only [ ]


A) Case details

Case ID: ___________________________ Related Case ID(s): _______________________
Main site/location: _________________________________________________
Assessment date/time: //______ Time: ______
Assessor (role): _______________________ Reviewer (role): _______________________

B) What is the risk about? (short)

Write 3–6 lines (facts only):



C) Risk scoring method (simple)

Likelihood (L): 1 Rare / 2 Unlikely / 3 Possible / 4 Likely / 5 Very likely
Impact (I): 1 Minor / 2 Low / 3 Medium / 4 High / 5 Severe
Risk score = L × I

Overall risk rating (tick): Low [ ] Medium [ ] High [ ] Critical [ ]

D) Risk categories (rate each one)

Fill in L and I, then score.

Risk categoryLikelihood (1–5)Impact (1–5)ScoreRisk rating (tick)Notes (1–2 lines)
D1) Safety risk to people (staff/visitors/monks)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D2) Risk to relic safety (theft/tamper/loss)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D3) Site security risk (doors/locks/keys/access)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D4) Crowd / event risk (pressure, protests, panic)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D5) Legal / governance risk (claims, orders, MoU dispute)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D6) Reputation / misinformation risk (rumours, fake news)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D7) Financial risk (donation dispute, loss, fraud)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________
D8) Staff wellbeing risk (stress, burnout, fear)______Low [ ] Med [ ] High [ ] Crit [ ]__________________

E) Current controls (what is already in place)

Tick what exists now:

  • Access control (keys list / limited holders) [ ]

  • Visitor supervision / sign-in [ ]

  • CCTV / alarm / guard routine [ ]

  • Secure storage checks [ ]

  • Verified communication channels (no action from screenshots) [ ]

  • Clear spokesperson rule (no random public comments) [ ]

  • Relic movement approval rule [ ]
    Other controls: _______________________________________________________

Controls working well? Yes [ ] No [ ] Partly [ ]
If “No/Partly”, what is weak: _________________________________________

F) Needed controls (what must be added)

List the top controls needed (short, practical):




G) Risk treatment plan (actions)

(Use one owner per action. Link to T231 Action IDs if already created.)

Action neededOwner (role)Due dateLinked templateStatus
____________________________________//____T231 [ ] T236 [ ] T237 [ ] Other: ___Not started [ ] In progress [ ] Done [ ]
____________________________________//____T231 [ ] T236 [ ] T237 [ ] Other: ___Not started [ ] In progress [ ] Done [ ]
____________________________________//____T231 [ ] T236 [ ] T237 [ ] Other: ___Not started [ ] In progress [ ] Done [ ]

H) Escalation triggers (when to act fast)

Tick any that apply:

  • Threats of violence / serious intimidation [ ]

  • Unauthorised access to relic area [ ]

  • Missing key / broken lock / forced entry signs [ ]

  • Plan to move relic without proper approval [ ]

  • Large crowd risk or protest risk [ ]

  • Fake “official order” appears and cannot be verified [ ]

  • Media pressure causing panic or harm [ ]

If any box is ticked, escalate to:
Security lead [ ] Head of Unit [ ] Board [ ] Authorities (as required) [ ]

I) Communication control for risk reduction

Main spokesperson (role): _______________________________
Public statement allowed now? Yes [ ] No [ ] Board only [ ]
Key rule (tick): “Facts first, calm tone, no blame.” [ ]

J) Review dates

Next review date: ____ / ____ / ______
Review frequency: Weekly [ ] Bi-weekly [ ] Monthly [ ] After incident [ ]

K) Sign-off

Prepared by (Name): _________________________ Role: ___________________
Signature: _________________________________ Date: //______

Reviewed by (Supervisor/Head): ________________________________
Signature: _________________________________ Date: //______