ဝန္ဒာမိ

If you accept guardianship of a sacred object, you accept a duty of truthful record-keeping about its fate.

Total Pageviews

ဝန္ဒာမိ

Namo Buddhassa. Namo Dhammassa. Namo Sanghassa. Namo Matapitussa. Namo Acariyassa.

ဝန္ဒာမိ စေတိယံ

ဝန္ဒာမိ စေတိယံ သဗ္ဗံ၊ သဗ္ဗဋ္ဌာနေသု ပတိဋ္ဌိတံ။ ယေ စ ဒန္တာ အတီတာ စ၊ ယေ စ ဒန္တာ အနာဂတာ၊ ပစ္စုပ္ပန္နာ စ ယေ ဒန္တာ၊ သဗ္ဗေ ဝန္ဒာမိ တေ အဟံ။

Saturday, December 06, 2025

Template T6 – Poem / Media Doctrinal Review Sheet

OFFICE OF SIRIDANTAMAHĀPĀLAKA / HSWAGATA MUSEUM – INTERNAL USE


Template No.: T06

Related Research Case IDs: Case 6 – Devotional Poem / Media & Doctrine

Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Prepared by / Role: ________________________________________________

Reviewed by (teacher / committee / editor): __________________________



Confidentiality Level:

[ ] Public summary     [ ] Internal draft     [ ] Restricted / Sacred



1. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title of the work:

(e.g. poem, song, video, short film, social media post, exhibition text)


______________________________________________________________________


Type of media:

[ ] Poem / lyrics

[ ] Song / chant

[ ] Video / film

[ ] Social media post (FB, IG, etc.)

[ ] Poster / leaflet

[ ] Exhibition panel text

[ ] Other: _______________________________


Author(s) / creator(s) and role(s):

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Intended audience:

(e.g. children, youth, general public, specific community, international visitors)


______________________________________________________________________


Main purpose of this creative work:

(e.g. inspire devotion, teach doctrine, promote event, raise funds, 

explain relic story, peace message)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Guiding question (case-based):

Does this poem / media piece communicate doctrine clearly and honestly 

to ordinary audiences, and support practice, or does it risk confusion, 

manipulation, or false claims?


Context notes:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________



2. BUDDHIST DOCTRINAL–ETHICAL LENS

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Key doctrinal themes mentioned in the work:

[ ] Buddha / relics

[ ] Dhamma teachings (list): _________________________________________

[ ] Saṅgha / monastics

[ ] Merit, rebirth, devas

[ ] Miracles / powers

[ ] Metteyya / future Buddha

[ ] Other: ___________________________________________________________


Check doctrinal accuracy:

Does the content:

- Match known teachings (suttas, commentaries, respected teachers)?

- Avoid obviously wrong or misleading statements?

- Use miracles and stories in a way that points to practice, not superstition?


Summary of doctrinal strengths:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Summary of doctrinal concerns / unclear points:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Guiding reflection:

How does this work help people understand anicca (impermanence), dukkha 

(unsatisfactoriness), anattā (non-self), and the path (sīla, samādhi, paññā)?

Does it encourage wholesome roots (non-greed, non-hatred, non-delusion)?


Planned corrections or clarifications (if needed):

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________



3. PEACE, CONFLICT & SDGs

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Impact on peace and harmony:

Could this work:

- Create jealousy or competition between relic sites or teachers?

- Promote fear, hatred, or “us vs them” attitudes?

- Increase social harmony, empathy, and understanding?


Potential positive impacts:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Potential negative impacts or risks:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Check for structural / cultural violence:

Does the work:

- Discriminate or stereotype based on gender, ethnicity, caste, class, 

  nationality, religion, or ability?

- Over-glorify individuals or groups in a way that could harm others?


[ ] No obvious issues

[ ] Some concerns (describe): ________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Mitigation ideas:

(e.g. adjust wording, add explanation, balance praise with humility, 

include more inclusive images or examples)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


SDG links (tick all that apply):


[ ] SDG 11.4 – Protect cultural and natural heritage

[ ] SDG 16 – Peace, justice, and strong institutions

[ ] SDG 17 – Partnerships for the Goals

[ ] Other: ___________________________________________________________



4. GOVERNANCE, ROLES & PROCEDURES

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Approval process:

- Who must approve this work before publication or display?

  (e.g. doctrinal reviewer, media team, head of institution, Saṅgha)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


List of reviewers and their roles:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Record of versions:

- Draft version(s) reviewed: _________________________________________

- Final approved version date: ____ / ____ / ______


Use and distribution:

[ ] Internal only

[ ] Public in temple / museum

[ ] Public online (website / social media)

[ ] Printed materials

[ ] Other: _________________________


Any restrictions:

(e.g. “do not use without context”, “not for children under X age”, 

“only with teacher explanation”)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Relevant internal rules/policies:

(e.g. communication policy, doctrinal review policy, use-of-image 

consent policy, fundraising guidelines)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________



5. ACTIONS / DECISIONS & H96 REFLECTION

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Decisions on this work:

[ ] Approved as submitted

[ ] Approved with minor changes

[ ] Approved with major changes required

[ ] Not approved (give reasons)


Brief explanation of decision:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


If changes are needed, list them:

1) _________________________________________________________________

2) _________________________________________________________________

3) _________________________________________________________________


H96 reflection:

“What would a peace-oriented H96 custodian want this poem / media piece 

to do in the hearts of listeners or viewers? How can it lead them toward 

ethical living, wisdom, and social harmony, rather than towards craving,

fear, or division?”


Reflection notes:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Check:

Are we using creative media as trustees of faith and heritage, or are 

we unconsciously using it for self-promotion, cult of personality, or 

financial gain?


[ ] Mainly trusteeship and service

[ ] Some risk of self-promotion / misuse (explain and address):

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________



6. RISK & SAFEGUARDS

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Key risks:

(e.g. misinterpretation, doctrinal confusion, offence to other groups, 

over-sensationalising miracles, online backlash)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Safeguards and mitigation measures:

(e.g. add introduction or disclaimer; pair media with live teaching; 

limit sharing to certain contexts; monitor responses; have a complaint 

channel ready)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________



7. FOLLOW-UP & LEARNING

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Planned follow-up after release:

- How will we observe impact (feedback forms, online comments, 

  informal conversations)?


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Next review date for this piece (if continued use is planned):

____ / ____ / ______


Notes from follow-up (to be completed later):

- Positive reactions:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

- Concerns or complaints:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

- Adjustments made after feedback:

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


Lessons learned for future poems / media:

(e.g. what worked well; what to avoid; how to keep a good balance between

beauty, devotion, doctrine, and peacebuilding)


______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________


သာဓိကာရ ပဋိဝေဒနာ

သာဓိကာရ ပဋိဝေဒနာ © ၂၀၂၁ ဘိက္ခု ဓမ္မသမိ (ဣန္ဒသောမ) သိရိဒန္တမဟာပါလက-ကာယာလယ. သဗ္ဗေ အဓိကာရာ ရက္ခိတာ. ဣဒံ သာသနံ တဿ အတ္ထဉ္စ အာယသ္မတော ဓမ္မသာမိဿ ဉာဏသမ္ပတ္တိ ဟောန္တိ၊ ယေန ကေနစိ ပုဗ္ဗာနုညာတံ လိခိတ-အနုမတိံ ဝိနာ န ပုန-ပ္ပကာသေတဗ္ဗံ န ဝိတ္ထာရေတဗ္ဗံ ဝါ.

Content Source Declaration

All content published on this website, www.siridantamahapalaka.com, including but not limited to articles, Dharma talks, research findings, and educational resources, is intended solely for the purpose of Dhamma dissemination, study, and public benefit. Some images and visual content used throughout this website are sourced from public domains, Google searches, and social media platforms. These are used in good faith for non-commercial and educational purposes. If any copyright holder has concerns regarding the usage of their content, please feel free to contact us for proper acknowledgment or removal. A portion of the Dharma talks, especially those categorized under "Dharma Talk" and "Dependent Origination – Questions and Answers", have been translated from the teachings of respected Venerable Sayadaws. Proper reverence is maintained in delivering these teachings with accuracy and sincerity for the benefit of Dhamma practitioners. We deeply respect the intellectual and spiritual contributions of all teachers and content creators. Our aim is to preserve, promote, and respectfully share the teachings of the Buddha.

©️ Copyright Notice

© 2021 Sao Dhammasami( Siridantamahapalaka) . All rights reserved. This articles and its contents are the intellectual property of Venerable Ashin Dhammasami and may not be reproduced or distributed without prior written permission.

🔸 Disclaimer on Translations and Content Accuracy

While great care has been taken in translating Dhamma talks and related materials, any errors, inaccuracies, or interpretative issues that may be found within this blog are solely the responsibility of the author. This website and its content are not affiliated with or officially represent any individual, group, institution, or monastery/temple or Musuem. All translations, interpretations, and editorial decisions have been made independently by the author with sincere intention for Dhamma sharing. We humbly request the understanding and forgiveness of readers and the venerable teachers, should any shortcomings or misinterpretations arise.